certiorari (13. 169)

Though we have strong affection for the work of courtroom sketch artist and respect the traditions of the institution at large, we found this latest venture from research professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law—founder of the Oyez Project, an unofficial (see also) multimedia archive of the US supreme court and the authoritative resource of audio records of each sessions proceedings—of publicising bench announcements, summaries, dissent and daily business of the courtroom as they happen, transcripts of the docket reenacted with AI avatars. Steadfastly refusing to otherwise make the docket exchanges available to scholars and reporters, though oral arguments are routinely broadcast as a holdover from the pandemic that the justices agreed to continue, the court may not be wholly appreciative of this presentation format—no cameras in court and the production team purposefully uses video that’s signature AI-painterly not too realistic for ethical reasons. The existence of the recordings that go back to the mid-1950s was secret until uncovered through Oyez in 1993 (sued by the court over the disclosure, though they relented and dropped the case) and generally inaccessible to the public until brought online and weren’t released before the next session after cases were heard and decisions rendered. The title refers to the appeal for judicial review.  Much more from NPR at the link above.