Saturday, 4 April 2015
wampum or echo base
five-by-five
huldufรณlk: elf-conservationists are stalling construction projects all over Iceland
pink punk: fun renditions of the theme from Blake Edwards’s Pink Panther
upstairs, downstairs: amazing and intricate stairwell concept models
the ballad of max headroom: rewritten by machine on new technology
pick-ups, perfume and pasta: fifteen commercial ventures directed by David Lynch
catagories: ๐ฎ๐ธ, ๐ถ, ๐, ๐บ, myth and monsters
Friday, 3 April 2015
salonniรจre or narrative structure
catagories: ๐ฌ๐ง, ๐, architecture, myth and monsters
columbian exchange
A pairing of thoughtful articles from Vox and รon magazines present some really interesting insights and unresolved questions about ushering in the Anthropocene epoch.
There are many contenders for when the handiwork of man might have outstripped, outpaced geological change, from the nebulous reaches of time when early humans first hunted giant mammals to extinction—although the Holocene Age (Greek for wholly new) seems to me to include the rise of man, the landing of the Niรฑa, the Pinta and the Santa Maria that introduced global trade and New World transplants to the Old, a point in 1610 when green-house gases began an uptick due to land-management practice, the Industrial Revolution, the atomic bomb, to the nuclear winter of 1964. While it is an arbitrary distinction to some extent and many researchers will continue to champion their favourites in terms of delineation once—if a consensus is reached, what’s nearly as significant as the change that man is imparting on the environment is that we’re adverse, maybe unable to recognise or reconcile is when and how man became estranged from Nature—fancied as no longer of Nature but rather Nature was made man’s ward, with us as not very fit caretakers. What do you think? For all the eons that have gone before, is this debate a reasonable one? It can nonetheless become a helpful one, I believe.
Thursday, 2 April 2015
five-by-five
chizukigou: check out these lovely Japanese map legend symbols
systรจme vidรฉo domestique: French artist repackages contemporary series and films in VHS wrapping
SMPTE bars: a look behind the scenes at the calibration tools of our seemingly seamless electronic world
maki-maki: sushi roll bath-towel concept
mirror, mirror: a look at Star Trek’s departures into an alternate reality
cartogram or far, far away
long-haul or get your kicks

Wednesday, 1 April 2015
per dexter, checky and fesse or worth 1000
Though we have already established that the arcane language of heraldry was constructed and preserved so as to transmit the design of emblems, devices and coats-of-arms accurately without necessitating drawing the whole pattern all over again, I am enjoying immensely looking through a pretty comprehensive handbook of heraldic design, researched and illustrated by one Hubert Allcock—who does not share his family’s crest. The above about not wasting time, ink and tincture on reproduction being true, the book’s one drawback is that it is rendered in black and white sketches, so one needs to colour by number.


Blazonry—that is the background composition of the shield is told in even more fantastic ways. Figure 21 is instructed as Paly of six, argent and sable (silver and black), a fesse counter-charged. 34 is Lozengy, argent and azure. 42 is patterned as Gyronny of eight, or (gold) and azure. 47 is per pily barwise, reversed pall (white) and azure. Of course, every design in this retinue was chosen to impart specific and readily recognisable virtues of its standard-bearer and the symbolism is nearly itself inscrutable.