friendnik

As the in-crowd and darling of the social network is preparing to launch its Initial Public Offering (IPO) early next year, there is news of the novelty winding down a bit. Tens of millions of user accounts have gone dark and growth has slowed recently. The phenomenon has been, I think, more of a fad, a craze and more temporary than any of us, regardless of our feelings for the medium (and it is a medium, less a venue and more like a utility--some services are essential, though we have been conditioned to regard money management and public profiles with more esteem) would like to admit. A lot of great and iconic things have fallen out of fashion, later to see a revival, or were transitional inventions to bridge a need--Rubik's Cube, Snapple and other things of forgotten pitch and moment. Maybe an existence based on being nosy and prying and instigating is not meant to last, and maybe popularity is waning because too many adults (parents) are embracing the tools of younger people. I am confident, however, even as an understudy is waiting in the wings, transforming social media into an investment instrument will cause it to be reinvented and revitalized in a number of ways.

Es gibt Nachrichten über die Ernüchterung mit dem sozialen Networking, gerade als der Liebling der Industrie seinen Börseneinführung für das kommende Jahr vorbereitet. Millionen Konten inactiv geworden, und seit diese Jahr hat sich die Wachstumsgeschwindigkeit etwas verlangsamt.

Egal ob wir für oder gegen den Werkzeug, daher ist dies eine Marotte, sondern ein Trend, der Bestand nicht haben wird. Ein Modeschrei verwandelt sich zu einem Vorsorgungsbetrieb und es mit sowie gegenseitige Achtung verhandelt, jedoch öfter als wir zugeben möchten. Viel ikonischen Dinge fiel oder steigt zugunsten von mit uns, wie Rubiks Zauberwürfel, mySpace und weitere. Einige Dinge werden vergessen, und andere sind durchquerend. Vielleicht kann solch eine Zusammensetzung (neugierig und unerwünschten) nicht überleben, oder vielleicht versagt es, weil ältere Leute die Technologie der jüngeren Menschen endeckte haben. Obwohl es immer eine bereite Doppelbesetzung geben wird, finde ich, dass Investition Wiedererfindung sein wird.

they

The Bilderberg Group is convening for their annual conference in Switzerland over the weekend.  Conspiracy and speculation can be entertaining, and I feel that either the power-brokers from Europe and the Americas getting together for a informal brain-storming session without the ideas they throw out being beholden to their politicians, press or investors to promote trans-Atlantic cooperation and sustainability or reptillian overlords plotting the enslavement of all of humanity are both equally plausible--behind closed doors.  I do not think, however, that this body is deciding on the news and developments for the coming year or acts as the shadow, world government.  If that were the case, I think they would be better hidden, less tolerant of the unexpected, and their agendas maybe would have been betrayed by puppets' string long ago.

for a gin and for a snare

With all the negative publicity that the lowly cucumber has been unfairly the brunt of and all the vegetable kingdom round, one might take the time to appreciate the idea of the garnish. It is surely shunned and revialed now, like a dental-retainer on the dinner table or some old chewing gum underneath it with the E. Coli epidemic still unsettled. This old Scottish bootleg distiller, Hendricks' (for what self-respecting and storied blender of Scotch would own up to a gin-joint on the side), makes its gin in an atmosphere of old roses and cucumbers, with a lot recipes to boot.  Besides, the alcohol would kill any stray germs.    Their website--and a good drink is not something that can just be beamed over the Internets--has a host of clever animations--reminiscent, I think, of Monty Python or Jib Jab, trivia, and oddities perfect for roquefort cheese.

grading on the curve or chatham house rules

The excellent curators at BoingBoing point our attention to a piece in the UK Guardian about credibility, reliable sources, and appropriate disdain- and skepticism-response. Whether or not readers share the estimate of newsworthiness, ascribe to the same crypto-ideology, still inviting an open discussion about the nature of journalism and whatever it has atrophied into--propaganda, social engineering, decoy--elevates any subject. There are no easy answers for the role of media and where the divide is between duty to report, duty to educate and sensationalism and indoctrination. The completely objective does not raise armies but trawling and anonymity, though seductive, demand, too, that the reader consider the source. Self-promotion should be vetted in the same way and is mostly harmless, and ought to be afforded the same opportunity and protection as undisclosed tipsters, ventors and activists, just as long as it is not presented dishonestly. That last standard, however, is very challenging to enforce and apply.

Die hervorragenden Kustos von BoingBoing zeigen einen Artikel vom Guardian des UKs über die journalistische Integrität und angemessene Leser-Skepsis (Schadenfreude). Egal ob die Leser teilen dieselbe Meinung oder nicht , über die neuartige Natur des Journalismus sprechend, erhebt das Thema. Die Verantwortung der Medien ist schwierig zu bestimmen. Was trennt Berichtspflichten von der Sensationshascherei oder Indoktrinierung? Neutralen Berichterstattung keine Anhänger gewinnen, und verführerische Geschichten sollten mit Vorsicht anzuwenden sind. Selbstdarstellerdrang sollte auf gleiche Weise untersucht werden. Tippfreunde, Nörgler und Aktivisten wird mit dem Standardverfahren behandelt, sofern sie nicht als die Wahrheit getarnt. Diese letzte Voraussetzung ist für alle eine Herausforderung zu durchsetzen.