Sunday 12 March 2017

sorry gina

As a cruel corollary to taking away affordable health insurance from not just the millions who benefited directly from Obama Care but also the general population of America—everyone besides those in the ruling caste and the independently wealthy—the Republican party have sponsored another resolution, as Boing Boing informs, that seems impossible to halt that would enable employers to coerce their employees to submit to DNA screenings or face stiff consequences. Privacy and right to refuse disclosure was previously protected by a 2008 expansion of civil liberties protections called the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) that helped to protect those who might be predisposed to being a bad insurance-risk in the eyes of underwriters.
A company, just because it contributes to its employees’ health coverage, could not force employees to undergo any testing against their will or own up to any future problem that a doctor had discussed with them in confidence, but now all those safeguards are undermined, since the government will allow DNA screenings to be incorporated into workplace wellness programmes, something completely voluntary but something that companies can also accentuate and incentivise however they choose. This is state-based eugenics—even if an individual benefited by participation by discovering some ticking time-bomb in time to diffuse it, no company would insure them and probably none would employ them either. What do you think? Let’s hope this is quickly remedied in America and never has the chance to be exported. It’s far more fraught with peril than the algorithms that pass judgement on our spending-power and is another hallmark of inward-turning ignorance that rejects scientific literacy and exploits an opportunity for profit without considering the repercussions. With workers surrendering their genes and traits that they could potentially pass along, business (with the government’s consent) are not far from instituting breeding programmes and sterilise those of us of inferior or subversive stock.

Saturday 11 March 2017

proost!

Taking advantage of the nice Spring weather, we had a chance to visit an outdoor Belgian cafรฉ and got the chance to give a proper toast to our friends in the newly discovered solar system hosted by a red giant in the constellation Aquarius, some forty light years distant.

Friday 10 March 2017

hr 1275

Amidst the flurry of coverage, I missed the fact that the House Resolution that replaces the Affordable Care Act is actually called the “World’s Greatest Healtcare Plan of 2017.” That really throws down the gauntlet, I think, and is inviting challengers to come up with something better, which is a pretty low bar for access. Perhaps one without lifetime caps, mental healthcare coverage, coverage for reproductive health and support for new families, affordable rates for the elderly and infirm?  What superlatives would you give to Dear Leader’s other real or threatened accomplishments of corporate welfare and codified xenophobia?

honeycomb hideout or finding buzz

Dispiritingly, the bee mascot is missing from the cartons of a popular breakfast cereal brand to highlight the seriousness of the plight of bees around the world, as Super Punch corroborates. The cereal box prize of this campaign is wildflower seeds to help bring back the bees and a raft of educational material on what individuals can do to improve their local ecology. I do hope that this send the message that sticks with especially young breakfast-eaters that we can indeed do something and bring back the bees.

Thursday 9 March 2017

fjord fairlane

Ground-breaking is to begin next year in Norway to create the world’s first waterway tunnel to be navigable by large, steamer-sized vessels, as Super Punch reports. The seventeen hundred metre massive engineering project is not meant to make sea-faring routes shorter by carving out a short-cut or more direct path, but rather to protect ships at this most treacherous point along the Norwegian coast, entering the Stadhavet Sea where the waters and weather of the North and Norwegian seas come together quite violently.

5x5

i spit in your general direction: on the contrary, the Archerfish is far more accurate, inviting a discussion on the intelligence of very small brains, via ร†on magazine
 
dank meme: the leak dump of tactics for exploiters aren’t all best-practises, nor the most up-to-date

what the dormouse said: journey down a rabbit hole in Shropshire leads to the discovery of a fantastic Templars’ grotto, via Boing Boing

allen wrench: Swedish lifestyle and furnishing empire introduces tables and chairs that snap together by means of a wedge dowel

oh, aunt jess: a curated collection of Murder, She Wrote guest-star trading-cards

Wednesday 8 March 2017

flipping the script

Writing for Marginal Revolution, Alex Tabarrok confronts us with a preview of an unsettling theatrical experiment conducted by New York University, wherein professors reversed the genders of the two US presidential candidates and directed professional actors to recreate the debates—portraying not only the dialogue and tone but also their respective body language.
Audiences expected confirmation of their beliefs that as few could stomach the behaviour of Candidate Trump on the dais, no one could tolerate such conduct coming from a woman. Instead their actual reception was quite different and spectators (participants in the experiment) could hardly reconcile themselves to what they were feeling, relating to the actress and harbouring distrust for the actor. What do you think is going on here? There’s a clip from the NYU campus at the link up top. Does unscripted lashing out come across as extemporaneous speech when one sees it coming from a woman?