Monday 29 November 2010

tranched or enhanced pat-down

The initial leak of high-level gossip of the diplomatic corps is may or may not of been in the best taste on the more sensational items: saying one leader lacks creativity or competency or is risk-adverse is just mean-spirited and makes for poor-working relations now that all these cables are out in the open, Ombudsman 2.0, where they cannot be denied or taken back. Some of these truths are manifestly apparent, even without careless documentation, however, there is no accounting for transparency.

Disclosure does not bring down regimes, although quite the opposite is true--that secrets have vouchsafed the bad things that government does. Ambassadors are entitled to the framework of their opinions are prejudices to work within or fail trying, however, the public is also entitled to knowing, regardless how the truth is ousted, the catalogue of other information revealed: like the German government is lousy with American spies, the US has pressured EU ministries into compliance for sharing of financial data despite resistance and no popular mandate, German authorities were strongly discouraged from pursuing justice against CIA agents who detained a citizen over mistaken identity, that the UN and the Secretary General are under surveillance, Saudi Arabia continues to bankroll terror activities, or that there are conspiracies for nuclear proliferation in the making. All this was only in the first batch, and meanwhile, the damage-control continues, inviting more speculation, in contrast to the apologies issued by the press, arguing for their decision to publish. Unvarnished truths may destroy diplomacy, relations built on old niceties and inherited respect, but also dispels the illusory embassy and the propaganda of American supremacy, which even the spokesmen have come to believe.